METHODOLOGY
As my
hypothesis is to discover whether ‘Broadsheet newspapers aim their newspapers
at a different audience to tabloids’, I investigated the discourse structure
and language of both types of newspaper. Over the 23th and 25th
of July I collected 3 broadsheet titles on two days (The Guardian, The Times
and I) and the same for tabloid newspapers (The Sun, Daily Mirror, Daily Star)
with the main topic being the birth of the Royal Baby.
COMPARABILITY
I collected
my data on the topic of the birth of the Royal baby, and the naming of him,
allowing a two day gap between them. By doing so, this allowed me to analysis
data on specific stories, allowing comparisons of language between to be far
more valid. I chose to use the
broadsheets The Guardian and The Times as these were reported to be the
extremely popular British quality newspaper titles (http://www.newspapers.co.uk/most-popular-uk-newspapers/),
with more popular newspapers such as Daily Mail being mid-market. Using
mid-market newspapers may reduce my level of comparability as it’s in between
broadsheet and tabloid. I also chose The Sun and Daily Mirror as tabloid
samples due to their popularity. For the broadsheet ‘I’ and tabloid ‘Daily
Star’, I also used these for comparability between them as both of them are the
cheapest newspaper under their categories,
to see if the language changes further, based on the price of the
newspaper. To minimise comparability issues, I collected the same titled
newspapers, on the same date, reporting the same story. This allowed my data
the ability to be compared between one another without a lack of reliability.
To improve comparability, when analysing the language of the lead report of the
Royal Baby, I will only analysis the front page and first 2 pages reporting the
story. By doing so, the data will be a similar sample size as particular
newspaper report it over 8 pages, and others over 2 pages. I also chose to
collect 3 titles of each broadsheet and tabloid to increase the
representativeness of coming to conclusions of broadsheets and tabloid, based
on the data.
RELIABILITY
One concern
I faced in my investigation was the possibility of lacking reliability when
analysing the newspapers, due to the newspapers only reporting a story for one
day. I overcame this problem by
collecting similar stories over 2 days, resulting in a large data sample. This
is likely to lead to far more representative data of the newspaper titles if
language features are found in the same newspaper on separate dates. However,
it can be argued that collecting two newspapers of each title not a large
enough sample, making the data unrepresentative of how the newspaper titles
usually write.
ETHIC Issues
As all the
newspaper titles were published for the public to read, no ethical issues can
exist when using data that consist only in the newspapers. This lead to no
complications of the possible Hawthorne effect created from recording people’s
behaviour and required no consent from applicants taking part in the data.